How do you use explainable AI in your workflow? (2024)

Collaborative AI in aviation (R&D) prioritises safety by bringing together experts from diverse fields to develop accurate, predictable, and understandable AI models. Rigorous testing, transparency, and human oversight ensure of adequate behaviour. Ethical frameworks address bias and privacy (e.g. air-traffic control is still a labour-intensive task), while compliance with regulations and continuous monitoring maintain safety. Explainability mechanisms are needed for safety-critical applications, for systems to be auditable and to ensure protection of systems and human lives.

XAI is key! The need for explainability is highly correlated with the impact of the AI applications. If we are using AI to recommend for us a movie or a restaurant we may not be bothered with how AI derived the recommendation. But if we are using AI to diagnose an illness, a health issue, or we are about to invest in millions dollar decision then we need to have a comprehensive understanding on the AI algorithm and how it derives ots outcomes.

XAI is like a "translator" for AI's language. It helps us understand how AI thinks and makes choices. Think about a time when you played a game of chess with a friend. If they made a move you didn't understand, you'd ask why they did that, right? XAI does a similar job for AI—it answers the 'why.' It makes sure AI isn't biased or unfair, can handle different situations, follows rules, and helps us communicate and work better with AI.

It is essential to assess the interpretability and comprehensibility of the chosen XAI technique. Opt for techniques that strike the right balance between accuracy and simplicity, ensuring that the explanations generated are understandable to both technical and non-technical stakeholders. Consider the computational cost and scalability of the technique, especially if you are dealing with large-scale or real-time applications. Evaluate the robustness and generalizability of the XAI technique across different datasets and model architectures, guaranteeing consistent and reliable explanations in various scenarios.

To choose an XAI technique: 1. Define objectives. 2. Assess model complexity. 3. Decide intrinsic/post hoc. 4. Consider audience. 5. Balance accuracy/interpretability. 6. Evaluate data availability. 7. Account for resource constraints. 8. Review explanation complexity. 9. Ensure consistency/reproducibility. 10. Meet regulatory requirements. 11. Leverage domain expertise. 12. Experiment and evaluate thoroughly.

Think of picking an XAI method like selecting the right tools for a DIY project. The AI model complexity is related to your project size; the XAI purpose is like your project goal. The audience for your explanation is like the people who will see your finished work. Different tools—like feature importance or visualization maps—fit different tasks.

XAI is one of the growing areas within the field of Artificial Intelligence and it is essential to have it to build more trust and confidence in the end users mind.The idea behind XAI is to justify the outcomes generated. This enables to provide better credibility for the AI systems. It can also lead to building responsible AI systems (another growing area within the field of AI)Some of the ways how XAI can be integrated are:1. Indicating key KPIs and metrics on the overall outcomes generated2. Visualizing XAI metrics such as confidence score, causality, fidelity score, and more.3. Target the right set of audiences to get human feedback and response.Overall it depends on human feedback & computational logic of XAI.

You might have a top-notch scientist, but if they can't explain their research, it's like a hidden treasure. XAI provides the 'language' to share your AI model's insights. It's crucial, like using Google Translate when you're lost in a foreign country. Metrics define your destination, the XAI tool is your vehicle, and the output is your journey's story.

Health sector and financial services are among the most heavily regulated sectors. Therefore, XAI is a must! Also under some regulations like the EU GDPR, citizens have the right to demand how algorithms derived outcomes if they have been impacted by the decision. For example, if someone on the EU ask for a loan bank and they git rejected they have the right to demand from the bank to explain how their algorithms decided or influenced the rejection decision.

As an AI enthusiast, I am excited to see how XAI will be used in the future. I believe that it has the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with AI systems, making them more accessible and understandable to everyone.

In the real world, XAI success boils down to impactful, understandable explanations that help users take action. Here are some:1. Actionable Insights, not just "Why": Forget just explaining why a loan was denied. Suggest realistic actions like debt consolidation or income diversification. Empower users with "what to do next" guidance.2. Understandable explanations > Slight Accuracy Drops: Choose XAI methods like feature importance that are clear even if they slightly reduce model accuracy. Remember, users need to grasp it, not just engineers.3. Tailor to your Audience: Don't bombard non-technical folks with jargon. Use simpler terms, analogies, and visuals to match their knowledge level and needs. Imagine explaining to your grandma.

Any best practice method has to cover the following areas:- Data analysis - Model evaluation- Production monitoring: this often ignored in practice.

Explainability should be considered early when designing AI systems, not an afterthought. Simpler models are often easier to explain. Prioritize explaining the most important or riskiest AI decisions that impact users. Use a combination of methods like visualizations, natural language, examples, and sensitivity analysis to cater explanations to different audiences. Validate explanations match model behavior across varied inputs. Explainability techniques introduce tradeoffs with accuracy, so measure the impact and tune. Overall, focus explanations on building appropriate trust in AI through transparency without overwhelming users with complexity. It's an iterative process but critical for the adoption of human-centered AI.

- Think about explainability as building trust between humans and AI, not just understanding how models work. Focus on the "why" not just the "how."- Explanations need to be actionable, helping users make better decisions working with AI. Avoid vague or overly technical details. - Explainability requirements and users' needs will evolve over time as AI systems and data change. Plan to iterate and improve explanations.- Be transparent about the limitations of current explainability methods. Manage expectations on how interpretable complex AI models can be.- Overall, focus on building trust in AI through explainability, but don't overpromise. It's an exciting area, but still maturing.

Considering the unexplainability of random actions coming often from Humans- the intelligence, which we have analyzed for thousands of years -Humans, really doubtful about XAI comprehensiveness for AI which we barely know even at this nascent stage.