"No taxation without representation" has been both a popular and important slogan championed throughout history. Though it may have originated in the mid-18th century, its meaning has carried for many centuries beyond. In both the past and present, "No taxation without representation" has been used as a form of protest against oppression and limitations on the rights of the people. It is most famously exemplified during the American Revolution, though the phrase has continued to be used throughout the world since.
American Revolution: Taxation Without Representation
The American colonists were the first to brand the phrase "No taxation without representation!" during the mid-1760s and into the 1770s. The British empire was still in charge of the colonies at the time, and both had just emerged from the French and Indian War. The British ended up fronting most of the cost of the war and as a result, their treasury was running very low on funds. They believed that the American colonists tended to have a higher standard of living than British citizens as a whole during the war, so it was decided by British parliament that American colonists would be taxed on goods to offset the costs of war and help replenish the treasury.
 |
The Stamp Act was introduced in 1765 and, as the British would very soon find out, its effects were extremely detrimental to relations between Britain and the American colonists. The Stamp Act directly imposed an additional fee on every piece of paper that was used in America, as well as cards and dice. These were among some of the largest-sold products in the colonies. Colonists immediately took notice of the fee and soon after, the Stamp Act Congress met in New York to discuss the act and how they should deal with it. In enacting the Stamp Act, the British demonstrated their belief in virtual representation; members of Parliament represented the people and interests of the entire empire, which America was a colony of, so therefore they did not need to physically be at the meetings because they were being represented through elected parliament officials from Britain. As far as the British were concerned, a member of Parliament had the ability to speak on behalf of all British citizens and colonists without consideration for governments of individual districts or the regions themselves. However, American Colonists tended to believe in actual representation, meaning that they believed they should be physically present at a governing body's meetings. Nine of the colonies present at the Stamp Act Congress meeting thus declared that the British had no right to tax the colonists, as the colonists did not hold any representation in British parliament.
These colony representatives insisted that the Stamp Act was in violation of the English Bill of Rights, which gave citizens individual rights--including the right to fair trade--under the governance of Parliament. They also believed that the act conflicted with the Mayflower Compact, which allowed citizens the right to self-govern themselves within the colonies while remaining loyal to Great Britain. Without the ability to self govern or exercise their individual rights to free trade, the American colonists began to boycott British imported goods. This is the earliest example of the phrase "taxation without representation."
The Ultimate Impact of "No Taxation Without Representation"
The slogan grabbed the attention of the civilian colonists, who took to shouting it often in the streets. They strongly opposed the newly imposed taxes on everyday items--which cost them a fair amount already--in addition to not being able to speak out against the Empire. It was yet another reason for the growing tensions between the British government and the colonial Americans. With the repeal of the Stamp Act in 1766 and passing of the Townshend Acts in 1767, which imposed further taxes on the colonies for major imported British goods such as tea and china, colonists were emblazoned with anger and took the slogan to heart. The slogan is speculated to even having taken on a new meaning: "No taxation by Parliament. No representation in Parliament. Let us run our own affairs." Protesting, boycotting of products from Britain, and the formation of secret British opposition organizations all led to events such as the Boston Massacre of 1770 and Boston Tea Party in 1773. These would go on to become major causes for the American Revolution.
Following the repeal of the Townshend Acts in 1770 by parliament in an attempt to calm America, the British believed that the colonists would begin to ease their tensions; however, this was not the case. The actions by both the American colonists and the British continued to make tensions flare, and the British continued to send troops to the colonies to watch the citizens more closely. On April 19, 1775, colonial militia clashed with British soldiers at Lexington and Concord after a shot was fired; it is unknown who fired the first shot, but it is believed that the British soldiers who were searching the town of Concord for arms intentionally confronted the approaching American militia. Thus began the American Revolution. On July 4, 1776, American colonists declared their independence from Great Britain, without the approval of British Parliament. The Declaration of Independence was written by the Second Continental Congress, a government created by the American people to voice their opinions to the Empire, even if they did not explicitly have the right to do so. Though taxation was no longer the primary focus of the American colonists, they were now represented by a makeshift governing body and their voices were being heard. The American Revolution concluded in 1783 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
Taxation Without Representation: Modern Examples
Taxation without representation is a concept that is still present today, long after the conflict between England and the American colonists. Presently, there are two notable fights for representation where there are taxes being imposed on a federal district or territory of the governing nation:
- Washington D.C., the capital of the United States, was not granted representation in Congress during the writing of the Constitution to keep the federal district neutral. They are taxed, though, and citizens have protested this since the 1800s.
- Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory. They do not pay federal income taxes, but they pay a higher local income tax amongst other taxes such as import and export taxes. They are not represented in American Congress.
 |
Both of these situations have some things in common. Firstly, they are both areas within the United States' realm of control and the people who reside within are considered American citizens. Yet, while Washington, D.C. may be the nation's capital, it is not a state. Puerto Rico also lacks statehood. As a territory of the United States and not a state or a fully independent country, Puerto Rico holds no representation in congress. Both areas are, however, still taxed by the United States. Washington, D.C. is taxed between 4-9%, while Puerto Rico has an average tax rate of 11%. The fight for representation by attaining statehood in both of these areas has been ongoing for over a decade, and they're not alone; across the globe, many groups that are governed and taxed without fair representation in government are also making their voices heard and attempting to gain the recognition they need to be represented in government.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
