Is Intel or AMD better for Photoshop?
As we mentioned in the introduction section, Intel has historically held a performance lead over AMD in lightly threaded applications like Photoshop, and this holds true for the new 14th Gen processors as well.
The Intel Core i9-13900K is one of the top CPUs on the market for running Photoshop. Its 13th-generation technology, Intel 10nm lithography, and impressive 24 cores and 32 threads make it a powerhouse for handling even the most demanding image editing tasks. Additionally, it has 8 P-Cores and 16 E-Cores.
Intel processors are noted for their single-threaded performance and faster clock speeds. AMD processors, on the other hand, have more cores and threads, making them more suited for multithreaded applications like content production and video editing.
Does Premiere Pro work better with Intel or AMD CPUs? At the moment, AMD is stronger in terms of live playback and exporting performance in Premiere Pro in most cases.
Bader, for video editing and tasks involving photo editing, the Ryzen 7 5800H with its 8 cores and 16 threads would generally perform better than the i7-1255U with its 10 cores and 12 threads.
If you're an occasional photo editor in Lightroom or Photoshop, AMD CPUs tend to be a little more cost effective and can typically handle those programs fine.
Which processor is best for photo editing on a desktop? When it comes to processors, you should aim for a fast and capable one. Look for desktops with processors from Intel® Core™ i5 or AMD Ryzen™ 5 series and above. These processors offer good performance for photo editing tasks.
Intel CPUs usually offer better performance and value for gamers than AMD processors. When calculating complex AI in a video game, you need higher instructions-per-clock (IPC) and single-thread clock speed, areas where Intel shines.
Intel does however end up offering better value in the mid-range than AMD more often than not, making it a compelling upgrade case for most users, many of which are invested in its 12th-generation CPUs in some cases with both subsequent generations compatible with the same motherboards.
Manufacturing Process: AMD uses a more cost-effective manufacturing process, which helps keep production costs lower than Intel's process. This enables AMD to offer competitive prices for its Ryzen CPUs.
What is the best CPU for Photoshop and Lightroom?
CPU | CPU Performance |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-13900F | 91% |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 86% |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 84% |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 83% |
Creators that use Adobe software need the fastest, most reliable technology to stay in their creative flow. The good news? Intel-based workstations can give you the performance, speed, and security capabilities to keep your work moving at the speed of light.
As much as eight cores is about where you hit the limit of additional cores making a dramatic impact in lots of Photoshop and Lightroom tasks (save for exporting and photo previews), six cores are more than enough for excellent performance in either application.
If you use your PC for more than gaming and need a processor that can manage multiple programs without a hitch, the AMD Ryzen 7 series is the superior option. Not to imply that Intel's Core i7 is incapable of multitasking. It can but with restrictions due to the limited number of threads.
A Core i7 will typically be better for multitasking, media-editing and media-creation tasks, high-end gaming, and similar demanding workloads.
Should I get an i7 or i9 core for Photoshop? All processors from i3 to i9 will work just fine for photoshop. Your processor isn't very important since all modern processors are fast enough. Make sure that you have atleast 8-16gb ram, a fast 500gb nvme ssd for installing photoshop and as a work drive.
The new 13th Gen Intel Core processors do well in Lightroom Classic, showing a solid 15% performance gain overall versus the 12th Gen CPUs they are replacing. This allows Intel to take a lead over AMD's new Ryzen 7000 CPUs, especially for active tasks like culling.
If you mainly use Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator and InDesign, an Intel Xeon 6-Core processor with a high clock frequency from 4.00 GHz in Turbo Boost is sufficient. However, if Premiere Pro and After Effects are used frequently, we recommend using a high-frequency Intel Xeon 8- or 10-Core processor.
AMD and Intel are closely matched but, ultimately, there's a clear winner. AMD takes the crown for gaming performance. Choosing an AMD processor will generally leave you with better game performance than Intel, especially at the high end, where AMD's 3D V-Cache processors rule.
- Apple Mac Studio. The best photo editing PC overall. Our expert review: ...
- Apple iMac 24-inch M3 (2023) Best mainstream photo editing PC. Our expert review: ...
- Apple Mac Mini M2 (2023) The best cheap photo editing PC. Our expert review: ...
- HP Envy 34 All-in-One. A serious iMac alternative for creative professionals.
Is Ryzen 7 good for Photoshop?
TL;DR: AMD Ryzen 7000 Series performance in Photoshop
The new AMD Ryzen 7000 Series processors do very well in Photoshop, showing a solid 22-30% performance gain versus the previous generation Ryzen 5000 Series.
You need 16GB only if you will be doing heavy editing in Photoshop, and even that is a bit of an edge case: PS is fine most of the time for most photography with 8GB. The only things I have seen using more than 16GB are video editing and 3D.
AMD processors have some disadvantages as well. For example , they are really less compatible with many peripheral equipment than Intel chips. Additionally , they often overheat, which can damage the computer's performance and lead to data loss or long lasting hardware failing.
productivity like video editing , graphics design etc , each and every Ryzen chip beats intel. 2. Gaming : Until and unless you are using i9 chip with top of the line specs Ryzen again beats intel here too both in price and sheer performance. But i9 beats ryzen in gaming by anywhere around 5%-15% in FPS count.
AMD's Ryzen CPUs have, at almost every generation, run consistently cooler than their intel counterparts even with similar power consumption.